Archive for electrical hazards

Arguing the “Myths” of an Electrical Arc Flash Hazard Analysis…

One very common “Myth” in dealing with Maintenance and Safety Managers across the country, regarding arc flash hazard analysis, is the attempt to rely on the basic PPE matrix chart in the NFPA 70e publication. First, we need to understand that the intent of the chart, as stated clearly in the text, is that it to be used in lieu off and only when an Arc Flash Hazard Analysis (Arc Flash Risk Assessment) has not been made to determine the incident energy at the point in question. In other words, Use the matrix only if you “Must” work in a panel before a proper arc flash analysis has been conducted. Equipment owners and employers must provide the information necessary to determine the correct PPE or personal protection equipment that a worker must wear or use.

This miss- conception, while dangerous and life threatening as it may be, is still argued almost every day between those safety and maintenance people who understand the regulations, and those likewise who just browse thru the publication, bouncing from section to section, looking for a “way out” of doing what is ultimately “Right” to protect the lives of those who are charged with working on or around those potent electrical panels.

I have had the opportunity to stand face to face with many Safety and Maintenance Managers throughout the nation and around the world, who from many different industries, have not been afforded the time to learn, nor, the time to seek updates on these types of regulations. In almost every case, where our meeting and conversation starts with a visit and citation from the friendly O.S.H.A. accident investigator, or inspector, or, by the requirements passed down through some “Corporate” mandated memo, these managers need help to decipher the miles of “Safety Ease” piled into OSHA 1910 or NFPA 70e. Relying on a solid consultant to give the proper advice is key.

Dave Carpenter BSEE

Electrical Engineer

Arc Flash Engineering

What Are Ground Fault Circuit Interrupters?

The Use of GFCI’s is now required by OSHA and NFPA 70E

Ground fault circuit interrupter (GFCI) is a mechanism that stops the current flow to an electrical device within a few milliseconds of when current begins to flow where it should not, such as through a human body. Also known as a residual-current device (RCD) in some areas.
GFCI’s are intended to prevent electrocution accidents. This type of accident is common where electrical tools or equipment are being used around water or environments where there is a lot of moisture.
GFCI’s are designed to interrupt the leak of an electrical current, which can often be smaller than the current needed to operate commonly used electrical tools and devices. The GFCI device stops a harmful level of electricity from flowing through the body of a person who comes in contact with the energized part of an electrical circuit.

Ground fault circuit interrupter (GFCI)

GFCI’s work by measuring the steady current used to operate a particular tool or device. If an inbalance occurs between the line and neutral conductors of more than about .005 amperes, then the circuit will instantly activate, open the circuit and the tool or device will be de-energized.

GFCI RecepticleThe use of GFCI’s is required by OSHA and NFPA (NFPA 70E 2012 Edition Section 110.4(C)) where the use of a permanently installed GFCI receptacle in a premise wiring system is not available. This situation is most common when a corded electrical tool or device is being used outdoors and a GFCI receptacle that is wired into the electrical system of a structure is not available.
The application of GFCI receptacles in residential homes has been an NFPA requirement since the early 1970’s. GFCI receptacles are commonly used in kitchens, bathrooms, and utility rooms. The GFCI receptacle usually has a red “reset” button and a black “test” button. Not all premises provide Ground Fault Circuit Interrupter receptacles so, ITU highly recommends that a portable GFCI unit be added to your tool box and as a part of your personal protection equipment (PPE) kit.

Improper power tool storage

Improper power tool storage and care will result in damage to the units electrical power cord. This causes a leak in the electrcial current which drastically increases the posibilty of electrocution.

Faulty electrical tools, devices, and extension cords injure or kill numerous workers annually. Don’t become a statistic! Portable GFCI units are relatively inexpensive, come in all shapes, sizes, and lengths and are available at most home improvement and hardware stores.

The risk of an electrical worker being injured or killed by electrocution or an electrical arc blast sometime in his or her career is already extremely high. So minimize the risk and follow the rules by utilizing a GFCI portable outlet device for every job.

Ground Fault Circuit Interrupters save lives! The risk of an electrical worker being injured or killed by electrocution or an electrical arc blast sometime in his or her career is already extremely high. So minimize the risk and follow the rules by utilizing a GFCI portable outlet device for every job.

References:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Residual-current_device
NFPA Journal www.NFPAjournal.com

Steel plant electrician burned in Arc Flash

Employee Burned in Arc Flash… Steel plant failed to provide and ensure the use of proper Arc Flash PPE. Proposed penalty: $147,000!

An electric technician at the Republic Steel Corp. steel manufacturing plant in Buffalo New York was removing wiring from a fan motor in an overhead crane on October 16, 2014, when an ungrounded electrical conductor touched a grounded surface causing an arc flash. The electric technician sustained third degree burns on her hand and first degree burns on her face.

An investigation by the Buffalo Area Office of the U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration found that Republic Steel failed to provide and ensure the use of effective face and hand protection by its employees.

“These injuries were avoidable. Republic Steel has a responsibility to make sure that its electric technicians are properly trained, equipped with and using personal protective equipment to protect from arc flash. In this case, that would include a face shield and rubber insulating gloves. The company should be especially aware of this, since OSHA cited Republic Steel earlier in 2014 for similar hazards at its Lorain, Ohio, facility,” said Michael Scime, OSHA’s area director in Buffalo.

As a result of these conditions, OSHA cited Republic Steel for two repeat violations, with proposed penalties of $70,000 each for the lack of hand and face protection. The steel manufacturer was also cited for one serious violation, with a $7,000 fine, for failing to protect employees against contact with energized electrical equipment. Total proposed penalties are $147,000.

The citations can be viewed here*.

Republic Steel has contested its citations and proposed penalties to the independent Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission.

Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, employers are responsible for providing safe and healthful workplaces for their employees. OSHA’s role is to ensure these conditions for America’s working men and women by setting and enforcing standards, and providing training, education and assistance. For more information, visit http://www.osha.gov.

Corn flour mill cited for exposing workers to electric shock hazards

Corn flour mill cited for exposing workers to explosion and electric shock hazards.

Minsa Corp. in Muleshoe, Texas, cited for 33 serious violations and $151,200 in fines

LUBBOCK, Texas – The accumulation of combustible grain dust requires more than just wiping surfaces to eliminate them. Grain dust accumulation, in the right combination of particle size, air and an ignition source, can expose workers to possible explosions or combustible dust hazards, according to citations issued to Minsa Corp. by the U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration. OSHA cited the employer for 33 serious violations, including exposing workers to electric shock, with a proposed penalty totaling $151,200.

“Dust accumulation exists in many industries including flour, feed, grain and sugar, requiring these employers to implement a standard housekeeping policy,” said Elizabeth Linda Routh, OSHA’s area director in Lubbock. “It is the employer’s responsibility to find and fix hazards that could harm workers.”

Internal parts of electrical equipment were contaminated with foreign materials, unused openings in a breaker box were not properly closed and an uncovered junction box exposed workers to live electrical parts. These are just a few of the serious electrical violations. Additional serious violations include workers being exposed to dangerous machinery, blocked emergency exit routes and falls from a platform lacking a guardrail. A serious violation occurs when there is substantial probability that death or serious physical harm could result from a hazard about which the employer knew or should have known.

The citations can be viewed at: http://www.osha.gov/ooc/citations/MinsaCorporation_986315_012115.pdf*.

Minsa, which employs 75 workers at the Muleshoe, Texas, location, has 15 business days from receipt of its citations to comply, request an informal conference with OSHA’s area director or contest the citations and penalties before the independent Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission.

To ask questions, obtain compliance assistance, file a complaint or report workplace hospitalizations, fatalities or situations posing imminent danger to workers, the public should call OSHA’s toll-free hotline at 800-321-OSHA (6742) or the agency’s Lubbock District Office at 806-472-7681.

Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, employers are responsible for providing safe and healthful workplaces for their employees. OSHA’s role is to ensure these conditions for America’s working men and women by setting and enforcing standards, and providing training, education and assistance.

Resources:

Osha.gov

Media Contacts:

Diana Petterson, 972-850-4710, petterson.diana@dol.gov
Juan Rodriguez, 972-850-4709, rodriguez.juan@dol.gov

Release Number: 14-2301-DAL